fully-associative - meaning and definition. What is fully-associative
Diclib.com
Online Dictionary

What (who) is fully-associative - definition

PROPERTY THAT DETERMINES HOW OPERATORS OF THE SAME PRECEDENCE ARE GROUPED IN THE ABSENCE OF PARENTHESES
Right associative operator; Right associative; Left-associative; Right-associative; Left associative; Left associativity; Right associativity

fully         
  • Aerial view (1949)
  • Population growth, 1990-2009
  • Houses in Fully
MUNICIPALITY IN THE CANTON OF VALAIS, SWITZERLAND
Fully VS; Fully, Switzerland; Fully (Valais); Les Follatères; Follatères
In total agrrement. Yes.
Hey, do you think we'll win tonight? Fully.
Fully         
  • Aerial view (1949)
  • Population growth, 1990-2009
  • Houses in Fully
MUNICIPALITY IN THE CANTON OF VALAIS, SWITZERLAND
Fully VS; Fully, Switzerland; Fully (Valais); Les Follatères; Follatères
·adv In a full manner or degree; completely; entirely; without lack or defect; adequately; satisfactorily; as, to be fully persuaded of the truth of a proposition.
fully         
  • Aerial view (1949)
  • Population growth, 1990-2009
  • Houses in Fully
MUNICIPALITY IN THE CANTON OF VALAIS, SWITZERLAND
Fully VS; Fully, Switzerland; Fully (Valais); Les Follatères; Follatères
Frequency: The word is one of the 1500 most common words in English.
1.
Fully means to the greatest degree or extent possible.
She was fully aware of my thoughts...
I don't fully agree with that.
= completely
ADV: ADV adj, ADV with v
2.
You use fully to say that a process is completely finished.
He had still not fully recovered.
ADV: ADV with v
3.
If you describe, answer, or deal with something fully, you leave out nothing that should be mentioned or dealt with.
Major elements of these debates are discussed more fully later in this book.
ADV: ADV with v
4.
Fully is used to emphasize how great an amount is. (WRITTEN)
Fully 30% of the poor could not even afford access to illegal shanties.
ADV: ADV amount [emphasis]

Wikipedia

Operator associativity

In programming language theory, the associativity of an operator is a property that determines how operators of the same precedence are grouped in the absence of parentheses. If an operand is both preceded and followed by operators (for example, ^ 3 ^), and those operators have equal precedence, then the operand may be used as input to two different operations (i.e. the two operations indicated by the two operators). The choice of which operations to apply the operand to, is determined by the associativity of the operators. Operators may be associative (meaning the operations can be grouped arbitrarily), left-associative (meaning the operations are grouped from the left), right-associative (meaning the operations are grouped from the right) or non-associative (meaning operations cannot be chained, often because the output type is incompatible with the input types). The associativity and precedence of an operator is a part of the definition of the programming language; different programming languages may have different associativity and precedence for the same type of operator.

Consider the expression a ~ b ~ c. If the operator ~ has left associativity, this expression would be interpreted as (a ~ b) ~ c. If the operator has right associativity, the expression would be interpreted as a ~ (b ~ c). If the operator is non-associative, the expression might be a syntax error, or it might have some special meaning. Some mathematical operators have inherent associativity. For example, subtraction and division, as used in conventional math notation, are inherently left-associative. Addition and multiplication, by contrast, are both left and right associative. (e.g. (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)).

Many programming language manuals provide a table of operator precedence and associativity; see, for example, the table for C and C++.

The concept of notational associativity described here is related to, but different from, the mathematical associativity. An operation that is mathematically associative, by definition requires no notational associativity. (For example, addition has the associative property, therefore it does not have to be either left associative or right associative.) An operation that is not mathematically associative, however, must be notationally left-, right-, or non-associative. (For example, subtraction does not have the associative property, therefore it must have notational associativity.)